Relatives' Distress Over Coastal Degradation Endangering Coastal Norfolk Graves
Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.
An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards
The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.
A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.
“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Past
One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy
Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.
“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Searching for Solutions and Certainty
The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.
Several families want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.
“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”
He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”
The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.